There are very few days to vote the Sustainable Economy Act with its controversial part relating to the discharge and the closure of the web. Here you will portray not only the PSOE, but the other parties, we must be attentive to who support (albeit by default, by not that much Pontius Pilate in the policy) to ZP and pants down to an Obama administration have highlighted the cables leaked by Wikileaks. Who certainly think that Obama has nothing to do with it, blinded because he has done more positive things, do not be fooled: it was imposed Biden as vice president but was he who sought and insisted when initially reluctant to go with him and There is no innocence in politics.
not worth washing face with last-minute amendments, the only honorable thing is if you want to change the law on issues of releases is to make a specific law for this case and not try to strain it in a package that supposedly is about how to save our economy.
The issue of content downloads by individuals against the wishes of those who obstenta distribution rights, against the historic right of private copying or the privacy of data and IP connection is complex, debatable and a rich range of grays and nuances on that analysis and opinion. What is not acceptable is to try to steal from external pressures and strain the debate by the back door action in the best dudoda constitutionality. The law also does not enter into the subject of the background (downloads), but also going to violate our legal system for something that will not serve for nothing, because to close some sites are not going to finish downloading.
A theme for thought: Every time the lobbies as a form of shock protection advocates who try to make them as criminals, they facilitate a little more than real criminals such as pedophiles are more difficult to pursue. Hundreds of thousands of people who download films or music will not give up easily but will use technology to hide what they are downloading so that their persecution is not viable without registering his address. The more people do this, the easier it will blend in among them, will be the technology more accessible, for those who engage in criminal activities.
Let no man deceive, the only way to reconcile the economic interests of creators with the attitude of consumers is to make these voluntarily decide to contribute directly or indirectly (merchaidising, concerts) for the content they consume. The copying of content is impossible to eradicate legal or technical means.
0 comments:
Post a Comment