momentarily interrupt the series on the Kindle to show my anger by lower PP and CiU pants. ZP can be happy, because now people are angry also with the alternative government and not just his government. For the PSOE the play of the law Sinde has gone badly: her popularity was already on the ground, so this would not affect them much, but now there is one fan handing over was crap and CiU and PP who have power switch them by themselves. Mira
PP and CiU had it easy to stay out of this mud: things are made with the reform of intellectual property law that already is not working and making shortcuts that jeopardize the legal certainty and also good for nothing. The PNV was more clever in its argument in rejecting the Congress. The law that emerged may be harder or not it is with the theme of the downloads, but it has to be well founded and not backroom got to be something to please the lobbies.
Positively, great act of dignity of Alex de la Iglesia with his intention to resign and I agree with him was inappropriate to make a stunt and torpedo the gala Goya (which incidentally under management has now be a gala that there are people you see.) Having a sense of opportunity and the grace and knowledge without being loud protest is something that abounds little among his peers. Elegance and dominion was not something I expected from someone with the thug's filmography Alex de la Iglesia, but the fact is that in his career as director of the Film Academy this was not an isolated incident, deserves praise his work and attitude correct and conciliatory.
The case is to close sites will not solve the problem. If these sites do something illegal, which will stop doing the other not be closing, but to punish those responsible. And that is done with the laws and justice system. It's like taking a law to cut the phone to a charge of threatening calls to be doing, rather than an indictment, or there is slander or not. The industry talks about the millions of advertising revenues is that true or a hoax? Because if you really entering million advertising know anything about this in Finance right?
try to make up the law saying that now requires a judge. Lords of PP and CiU, the question is not what has improved from one version to another, but what the law changes regarding the current situation. Others have already highlighted some dangerous changes and possible collisions with the Constitution. I just reported on two things are probably not serious but enough to piss me off me as a taxpayer concerned about the smooth running of the Administration of Justice:
- body is created under the control of government is mediating, when they should be complainants who are responsible directly to go to the judges. Why is this agency to pay public money to amedentrar, especially the provider? Why industry Entertainment need an intermediary, for his claims, as have lawyers, and ordinary citizens instead of any matter with the law do not have these intermediaries and have to pay us a lawyer? Is this not discriminatory, disproportionate and absurd?
- is assigned to the National Court and are given very short deadlines. Why are other issues with the law, for example, someone who does not pay and need the money to turn your mortgage, let alone for more serious matters of criminal justice (detention of someone who does not know whether he is guilty or the alleged offender on the street while waiting) is not imposed by law just short deadlines and a trial court directly direct? If it is about money and agility, no discrimination on the one thing I do not think it's more of a priority. If for guarantees for the defense of the accused, should be the same here.
0 comments:
Post a Comment