I did not see the show of the Goya, although I've read an excerpt from the speech of Alex de la Iglesia. I have heard very positive reviews of the speech, but also other critical targeting has not said more than platitudes. And indeed it has, what happens is that there are obvious things that seem to need to be remembered.
Alex de la Iglesia seems to be more aware than most of his colleagues that the hard way not to get anything going and respectable goat is not a good idea. And although this has not already said in his speech, the / ladies / as academics should remember that those who insult not only the public but those who vote need policies that make English cinema has by grants (direct or indirect, such as screen quotas, required to invest in television or canon). To people who consider themselves left, prone to speech which is to spend public money to support the film because it is culture, held a policy change by pure anger. Delete
downloads is impossible, but although they succeeded not change that there is a huge imbalance between demand (the audience, including they see the movies only on TV or downloaded over the hill) and supply of English cinema. In my opinion there are English films do not contribute anything and should not have done, of course this also applies to foreign films, but now I'm concerned about our country, by those grants. Hump \u200b\u200bme see "opera prima" not cool, works that do not stand comparison with the independent cinema of other countries, no cultural films that are worth more to form in the library reading and create funds for thousands of children in the villages.
I am proud to be English (in our history and our present, In our country such a poor viejete know if you have a disease, but is expensive and does not have a hard, we're not going to let her die without treatment). But do not drink the strange "patriotism" with which the film is English. One manifestation of this "patriotism" movie "is to treat the English film industry like the selection and there is reason to rejoice in their successes, but the film makes us feel shame and against his rival us feel admiration (and mentioned this over five years: http://chemaper.blogspot.com/2005_03_01_archive.html ). The other manifestation of this silly "patriotism" is one that has to be promoted and subsidize the English cinema, although it is a cultural and film without ever needing something to make that an inhabitant of this country feel more reflected the view that before a foreign film. You see crime nearest independent films foreign (simply because delve into human subjects, universal regardless of culture) that many English, which are closed to the narrow and obsessive author.
One final note. While I applaud the attitude of Alex de la Iglesia and it seems like the petty people like Icíar Bollaín, hallucinate seeing people lose their discretion when someone says they want to hear or otherwise will fit. Of course rather have a beer and chat with Alex de la Iglesia with someone like Icíar Bollaín. But when a movie I do not doubt that I prefer the the edge, stiff and myopic Bollaín the sympathetic and full of common sense Alex de la Iglesia.
And needless to say, the saga Torrente is shit and I do not care whether or not it supports Santiago Segura's speech Alex de la Iglesia (by the way, in his statements said that if he resigned resigning Alex, yes sir, no by arguments but by the person).
0 comments:
Post a Comment